Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:16

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is the most unwatchable movie you have sat through?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Scientists Are Getting Closer to Finding Evidence of the Fifth Force - Yahoo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some recommended marketing automation tools for beginners?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Bowel Cancer in Young People Is Rising – Here's How to Reduce Your Risk - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why won't my mom let me come home if I'm homeless?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Need a different reason to eat more fiber? How about microplastics? - The Seattle Times